Table of Contents previous section next section
TEACHING: Standard 4 - Tools for Enhancing Discourse

The teacher of mathematics, in order to enhance discourse, should encourage and accept the use of-

computers, calculators, and other technology,

concrete materials used as models;

pictures, diagrams, tables, and graphs;

invented and conventional terms and symbols;

metaphors, analogies, and stories;

written hypotheses, explanations, and arguments;

oral presentations and dramatizations.

 

Elaboration

In order to establish a discourse that is focused on exploring mathematical ideas, not just on reporting correct answers, the means of mathematical communication and approaches to mathematical reasoning must be broad and varied. Teachers must value and encourage the use of a variety of tools rather than placing excessive emphasis on conventional mathematical symbols. Various means for communicating about mathematics should be accepted, including drawings, diagrams, invented symbols, and analogies. The teacher should introduce conventional notation at points when doing so can further the work or the discourse at hand. Teachers should also help students learn to use calculators, computers, and other technological devices as tools for mathematical discourse. Given the range of mathematical tools available, teachers should often allow and encourage students to select the means they find most useful for working on or discussing a particular mathematical problem. At other times, in order to develop students' repertoire of mathematical tools, teachers may specify the means students are to use.

 

Vignettes

The teacher expects not just answers, but also reasons. 4.1 Mr. Johnson has presented his first-grade class with several pairs of numbers and asked them to decide which number is greater and to justify their responses. He has also been encouraging them to find ways to write these comparisons.
The child uses objects to communicate and justify his answer. Ben: I think 5 is greater than 3 because (he walks to the board and sticks five magnets up and then carefully sticks three magnets in another row).
The teacher encourages students to use symbols to represent and communicate about ideas.

Mr. Johnson asks whether that makes sense to other people. The children nod. He asks if anyone wants to show how they would write this down.

Kevin, up at the board, writes:

Next, Betsy writes:

Mr. Johnson: Can you explain what you were thinking? Kevin?

The teacher accepts more than one way of representing the idea with symbols; both are nonstandard but sensible.

The teacher poses a challenge that requires students to invent a means of recording an idea.

Kevin explains that his arrow shows that 5 is more than 3 because the bigger number "can point at" the smaller one.

Mr. Johnson asks Betsy to explain hers, and she says that she thinks you should just circle the smaller one.

Mr. Johnson: What if the two numbers you were comparing were 6 and 6? What would you do? How would you write that?

The teacher gives students time to think before responding. He doesnât repeat the question or call on children; he is silent.

 

The teacher connects the studentsâ approaches and reasoning to the conventional notation. Because the students have thought about what it means for two numbers to be equal, they are ready to learn how that is conventionally represented. In this case, the notation follows the development of the concept in a meaningful context.

Several seconds pass. Ruth shoots her hand in the air. Several others also have their hands up.

Ruth: You could draw an arrow to both of them.

Annie: You could circle both of them because they are the same.

Jimmy: You shouldn't mark either one, either way. They are not greater or less. They are the same.

Mr. Johnson nods at their suggestions. He writes an equals sign (=) on the board and explains that this is a symbol that people have invented for the ideas the children have been talking about.

Rashida: That's like what Ruth said.

Ruth beams and Annie calls out: It's like mine too.

The teachers have posed as task that requires students to communicate about mathematics-in pairs as well as in the whole group-and that lends itself to a variety of tools. 4.2 Mrs. Martinez and Mr. Golden, who have teamed up to teach eighth grade this year, have divided their students into groups of four. The teachers have challenged them to show why the text says that division by zero is "undefined." The teachers want their students to know why "you can't divide by zero." Usually that is all that students have learned. Once the students figure out why division by zero is undefined, they are to prepare something that they could use to justify their explanation to the rest of the class.

The teachers suggest particular tools in order to stimulate students to make choices about what might help them work on the problem.

 

The teacher suggests another tool-a graph-that might help the students make mathematical connections, examine the pattern they are seeing, and present their work to the rest of the group.

Mrs. Martinez suggests that the calculator may be a useful tool for this problem. "Making up some kind of story problem for a situation that involves division might be helpful for others," adds Mr. Golden. The two teachers have arranged their large classroom so that calculators, graph paper, Unifix cubes and base ten blocks, felt-tip markers and blank overhead transparencies, rulers, and other materials are out where students can freely use them. This facilitates the use of alternative tools. Students are encouraged and expected to make decisions about which tool to use. Several students are, in fact, preparing overheads to display their conclusions about division by zero. Others are excitedly punching calculator buttons.

"The answer keeps getting larger and larger!" exclaim a pair of girls as they watch the results obtained by successively dividing 4 by smaller and smaller divisors with the calculator. "Why is that important?" asks Mrs. Martinez as she watches over one girl's shoulder. "Well, because each of the numbers we are dividing by is getting closer and closer to zero but isn't zero." "Maybe you could make a graph to show what you are finding," suggests Mrs. Martinez.

In this situation, the teacher chooses to point the students directly to a means of working on and discussing the problem that plays off of important mathematical connections.

Having introduced this idea as a tool for working on the problem, the teacher leaves the students to use it on their own.

Mr. Golden finds two students slouching sullenly in their chairs behind the room divider. "We don't understand what to do," grumbles one. Sitting down next to them, Mr. Golden begins, "Let's see if I can help. You are trying to figure out what the special problem is in trying to divide by zero. Maybe you can use some things you already know about division. How do you know that 82 is 4? How could you prove that if someone challenged your answer?" The students look at him disbelievingly. He waits. Then one says, "Well, I'd just say that 4 times 2 is 8 so 8 divided by 2 has to be 4. " "Can that help you at all with this problem?" asks Mr. Golden. He stands up. The two students look at one another and then, sitting up a bit, begin talking. "Well, that doesn't work if you take 80, " Mr. Golden hears one say as he walks away.


Summary: Discourse

Because the discourse of the mathematics class reflects messages about what it means to know mathematics, what makes something true or reasonable, and what doing mathematics entails, it is central to both what students learn about mathematics as well as how they learn it. Therefore, the discourse of the mathematics class should be founded on mathematical ways of knowing and ways of communicating. The nature of the activity and talk in the classroom shapes each student's opportunities to learn about particular topics as well as to develop their abilities to reason and communicate about those topics. Students' dispositions toward mathematics are also fundamentally influenced by the experiences they have with mathematical activity. Although teachers may seem quieter at times, the teacher is nevertheless central in fostering worthwhile mathematical discourse within the classroom community. Teachers' skills in developing and integrating the tasks and discourse in ways that promote students' learning depend on the construction and maintenance of a learning environment that supports and grows out of these kinds of thinking and activity. It is to this issue that we now turn.

 

 
Back to top
next sectionnext section
Home | Table of Contents | Purchase | Resources | NCTM Home | Illuminations Website
Copyright © 1991 by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.