|
The teacher of mathematics
should create a learning environment that fosters the development
of each student's mathematical power by-
providing and structuring the time necessary to explore sound
mathematics and grapple with significant ideas and problems;
using the physical space and materials in ways that facilitate
students' learning of mathematics;
providing a context that encourages the development of mathematical
skill and proficiency;
respecting and valuing students' ideas, ways of thinking, and
mathematical dispositions;
and by consistently expecting
and encouraging students to-
work independently or collaboratively to make sense of mathematics;
take intellectual risks by raising questions and formulating conjectures;
display a sense of mathematical competence by validating and supporting
ideas with mathematical argument.
Elaboration
This standard focuses on
key dimensions of a learning environment in which serious mathematical
thinking can take place: a genuine respect for others' ideas, a
valuing of reason and sense-making, pacing and timing that allow
students to puzzle and to think, and the forging of a social and
intellectual community. Such a learning environment should help
all students believe in themselves as successful mathematical thinkers.
What teachers convey about
the value and sense of students' ideas affects students' mathematical
dispositions in the classroom. Students are more likely to take
risks in proposing their conjectures, strategies, and solutions
in an environment in which the teacher respects students' ideas,
whether conventional or nonstandard, whether valid or invalid. Teachers
convey this kind of respect by probing students' thinking, by showing
interest in understanding students' approaches and ideas, and by
refraining from ridiculing students. Furthermore, and equally important,
teachers must teach students to respect and be interested in one
another's ideas.
Demonstrating respect for
students' ideas does not imply, however, that teachers or students
accept all ideas as reasonable or valid. The purpose of valuing
students' ideas and ways of thinking is not just to make students
feel good but to foster the development of their understanding of,
and power with, mathematics. Therefore, the central focus of the
classroom environment must be on sense-making. Mathematical concepts
and procedures - indeed, mathematical skills - are central to making
sense of mathematics and to reasoning mathematically. Teachers should
consistently expect students to explain their ideas, to justify
their solutions, and to persevere when they are stuck. Teachers
must also help students learn to expect and ask for justifications
and explanations from one another. Teachers' own explanations must
similarly focus on underlying meanings; something a teacher says
is not true simply because he or she "said so."
Emphasizing reasoning and
justification implies that students should be encouraged and expected
to question one another's ideas and to explain and support their
own ideas in the face of others' challenges. Teachers must help
students learn how to do this: Students need to learn how to question
another's conjecture or solution with respect for that person's
thinking and knowledge. They also need to learn how to justify their
own claims without becoming hostile or defensive.
Serious mathematical thinking
takes time as well as intellectual courage and skills. A learning
environment that supports problem solving must allow time for students
to puzzle, to be stuck, to try alternative approaches, and to confer
with one another and with the teacher. Furthermore, for many worthwhile
mathematical tasks, tasks that require reasoning and problem solving,
the speed, pace, and quantity of students' work are inappropriate
criteria for "doing well." Too often, students have developed
the idea that if they cannot answer a mathematical question almost
immediately, then they might as well give up. Teachers must encourage
and expect students to persevere, to take the time to figure things
out. In discussions, the teacher must allow time for students to
respond to questions and must also expect students to give one another
time to think, without bursting in, frantically waving hands, or
showing impatience.
Students' learning of mathematics
is enhanced in a learning environment that is built as a community
of people collaborating to make sense of mathematical ideas. It
is a key function of the teacher to develop and nurture students'
abilities to learn with and from others - to clarify definitions
and terms to one another, consider one another's ideas and solutions,
and argue together about the validity of alternative approaches
and answers. Classroom structures that can encourage and support
this collaboration are varied: students may at times work independently,
conferring with others as necessary; at other times students may
work in pairs or in small groups. Whole-class discussions are yet
another profitable format. No single arrangement will work at all
times; teachers should use these arrangements flexibly to pursue
their goals.
Vignettes
5.1 A class of primary
students has been working on problems that involve separating or
dividing. The teacher, Laurie Morgan, is trying to give them some
early experience with multiplicative situations at the same time
that she provides them with contexts for deepening their knowledge
of and skill with addition and subtraction. These students can add
and subtract, but their understanding of multiplication and division
is still quite informal. They have begun to develop some understanding
of fractions, connected to their ideas about division. They have
not yet learned any conventional procedures for dividing.
|
|
The teacher has
selected this problem because it is likely to elicit alternative
representations and solution strategies as well as different answers.
It will also help the students develop their ideas about division,
fractions, and the connections between them.
The teacher allows
time for the children to develop their solutions independently,
with a few others, and then in the whole group. By asking who would
like to share their solution, she encourages the students to take
intellectual risks.
|
Today Mrs. Morgan has given
them the following problem:
If we make 49 sandwiches
for our picnic, how many can each child have?
After they have worked for
about twenty minutes, first alone and then in small groups, Mrs.
Morgan asks if the children are ready to discuss the problem in
the whole group. Most, looking up when she asks, nod. She asks who
would like to begin.
Two girls go to the overhead
projector. They write:

|
|
Students expect
to have to justify their solutions, not just give answers.
The teacher solicits
other students' comments about the girls' solution without labeling
it right or wrong. She expects the students, as members of a learning
community, to decide if an idea makes sense mathematically.
Students respectfully
question one another's ideas. The girls "revise" their
solution because they have been convinced by the boy's explanation.
There is no sense here that being wrong is shameful.
|
One explains, "There
are twenty-eight kids in our class, and so if we pass out one sandwich
to each child, we will have twenty-two sandwiches left, and that's
not enough for each of us, so there'll be leftovers."
The teacher and students
are quiet for a moment, thinking about this. Then Mrs. Morgan looks
over the group and asks if anyone has a comment or a question about
this solution.
One boy says that he thinks
their solution makes sense, but that "nine minus eight is one,
not two, so it should be twenty-one, not twenty-two." He demonstrates
by pointing at the number line above the chalkboard. Starting at
nine, he counts back eight using a pointer. The two girls ponder
this for a moment. The class is quiet. Then one says, "We revise
that. Nine minus eight is one." Mrs. Morgan is listening closely,
but does not jump into the interchange.
Another child remarks that
he had the same solution as they did - one sandwich.
|
|
The students work
together to solve the problem. Sometimes they build on the solutions
offered by classmates. The teacher gathers insights about students
through close listening and observation. At times, she takes responsibility
for pushing students' thinking along.
The teacher expects
the students to reason mathematically.
|
"Frankie?" asks
Mrs. Morgan, after pausing for a moment to look over the students.
She remembers noticing his approach during the small-group time.
Frankie announces, "I think we can give each child more than
one sandwich. Look!" He proceeds to draw twenty-one rectangles
on the chalkboard. 'These are the leftover sandwiches," he
explains. "I can cut fourteen of them in half and that will
give us twenty-eight half-sandwiches, so everyone can get another
half."
"I agree with Frankie,"
says another child. "Each child can have one and a half sandwiches."
"Do you have any leftovers?"
asks the teacher.
"There are still seven
sandwiches left over," says Frankie.
"What do the rest
of you think about that?" inquires the teacher.
|
|
Students seem
willing to take risks by bringing up different ideas.
The teacher expects
students to clarify and justify their ideas.
|
Several children give explanations
in support of Frankie's solution. "I think that does make sense,"
says one girl, "but I had another solution. I think the answer
is one plus one-half plus one-fourth."
"I don't understand,"
Mrs. Morgan says. "Could you show what you mean?"
|
|
The teacher has
posed a task that gives the students an opportunity to develop their
understanding of "sample" and "population,"
as well as to build their ability to use statistics to reason about
real-world situations.
The task itself
promotes collaboration. It is not clear how to proceed, and everyone's
contributions are needed in order to come up with an approach.
The teacher is
providing time for students to grapple with the problems.
These students
seem to have developed the disposition to question one another,
and they respond to one another's queries as a matter of course.
Helping a group
of students develop a sense of community is facilitated by having
some sense of shared purpose.
The students
seem accustomed to thinking through problems together.
|
5.2 Mr. Cohen's class
of high school students is working in small groups on projects that
involve collecting, organizing, and interpreting data. Before beginning,
they had a discussion about different possibilities for their projects.
They decided on questions that they would like to pursue, such as
finding the average number of hours per week that high school students
work.
One group, having read an
article in the newspaper on changes in the popularity of first names
in the last sixty-five years, has decided to investigate the most
common boy's and girl's first names among students their age in
the city. Is John still the most common boy's name, as it was in
1925, 1950, and 1975? They are curious about what is happening with
girls' names, since the popular names seem to change more often.
Because theirs is an ethnically diverse community, they also wonder
how that affects the pattern of names.
Mr. Cohen works his way
around to the different groups, listening, making suggestions, and
verifying that the group members are listening and working together.
The group that is working on the names study has decided to sample
the high school population in the city and is discussing the best
way to go about this.
John: Let's choose
three of the high schools and then write to them and ask for a list
of the students enrolled in the school. We can take our sample from
those lists at random.
Jenny: But how will
we pick the three schools? And why is three a good number to pick?
John: It seemed like
enough out of all the schools in this city if we were careful to
include one of the schools that has more kids from different backgrounds,
because we want to make sure our sample has lots of different kinds
of names, just like there are around here.
Anna: I think we
should try to figure out about how many high school kids there are
in the whole city and then pick a size for our sample based on that.
John (nodding): I
guess that makes sense. How are we going to figure that out, though?
Maria: And then how
big would our sample have to be to be big enough? We want to be
pretty sure that our sample tells us something about all the kids
in high school here.
|
| The
teacher monitors how the group is proceeding. He also offers resources
where appropriate. |
Mr.
Cohen is standing by the group. He says that their discussion so far
is productive, that they are dealing with some important questions
for their project. He suggests a source that might help them think
about the question of how many students they need to have in their
sample. He also tells them that the administration office would have
a list of all the high schools and how many students attend each of
them. He asks if they would like him to call and ask for that list.
They say that they would. He asks what they are going to do once they
get the list. |
| It
can be difficult to get students who are used to working alone to
understand or appreciate collaborative work. Simply moving students
into small groups is not likely to prepare them adequately to work
together well. The task also makes a difference. Here, these exercises
may not spur discussion in the way that another more problematic or
intellectually challenging task might. |
5.3 Mr. Davies, who
teaches seventh grade, wants to begin encouraging a more collaborative
environment in his classroom. However, he finds that his students
seem anxious about having the right answer. They do not reflect
on whether or not their answers make sense - as long as they match
the answer key. They do like to work in groups, but it seems that
the attraction is primarily social.
For example, one day when
they were working on a set of ratio and proportion exercises and
story problems, he told them to form small groups to discuss the
work. The groups were loud, and in each group someone seemed to
dominate while others sat by passively. When their answers differed,
they usually erased their answers to match one another's. Typically
the answer considered "right" was the answer given by
Julio or Evie - or whomever they considered smartest in math.
|
|
Teachers can help
one another focus on and enhance the learning environment.
Tasks affect
both the environment and the discourse. Different tasks require
different types of instructional strategies.
Teachers give
off many cues about what is valued. When teachers are trying to
change their approach, sometimes the messages students receive can
get mixed.
|
Discouraged, Mr. Davies
consults with the teacher next door, who offers to come observe
during her physical education period the next day. As they talk,
she suggests that the tasks he is using in the groups may be contributing
to the problems. Together they design a couple of tasks dealing
with ratio and proportion that they think might get the students
thinking more and also provoke better discussion in the groups.
When she observes him, she also notices that he frequently praises
students for having the right answer and prods those who are not
doing their "own work." She points this out to him gently,
confessing that this gives her a hard time, too. He says, ruefully,
"I guess we have some habits that give the kids some mixed
messages at times."
Summary: Environment
The learning environment
is a key element in fostering the goals of the Curriculum and Evaluation
Standards for School Mathematics. Creating an environment that supports
and encourages mathematical reasoning and fosters all students'
competence with, and disposition toward, mathematics should be one
of the teacher's central concerns. The nature of this learning environment
is shaped by the kinds of mathematical tasks and discourse in which
students engage. Teachers' skills in developing and integrating
the tasks, discourse, and environment in ways that promote students'
learning are enhanced through thoughtful analysis of their instruction,
which is the focus of the last section of the standards for teaching.
|
|