|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| p. 288 |
With the experience proposed here in making connections and solving problems from a wide range of contexts, students will learn to adapt flexibly to the changing needs of the workplace. The emphasis on facility with technology will result in students' ability to adapt to the increasingly technological work environments they will face in the years to come. By learning to think and communicate effectively in mathematics, students will be better prepared for changes in the workplace that increasingly demand teamwork, collaboration, and communication (U.S. Department of Labor 1991; Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 1996). Note that these skills are also needed increasingly by people who will pursue careers » in mathematics or science. With its emphasis on fundamental concepts, thinking and reasoning, modeling, and communicating, the core is a foundation for the study of more-advanced mathematics. Consider, for example, the recommendations for precalculus courses generated at the Preparing for a New Calculus conference (Gordon et al. 1994, p. 56):
A central theme of Principles and Standards for School Mathematics is connections. Students develop a much richer understanding of mathematics and its applications when they can view the same phenomena from multiple mathematical perspectives. One way to have students see mathematics in this way is to use instructional materials that are intentionally designed to weave together different content strands. Another means of achieving content integration is to make sure that courses oriented toward any particular content area (such as algebra or geometry) contain many integrative problemsproblems that draw on a variety of aspects of mathematics, that are solvable using a variety of methods, and that students can access in different ways.
High school students with particular interests could study mathematics that extends beyond what is recommended here in various ways. One approach is to include in the program material that extends these ideas in depth or sophistication. Students who encounter these kinds of enriched curricula in heterogeneous classes will tend to seek different levels of understanding. They will, over time, learn new ways of thinking from their peers. Other approaches make use of supplementary courses. For instance, students could enroll in additional courses concurrent with the program. Or the material proposed in these Standards could be included in a three-year program that allows students to take supplementary courses in the fourth year. In any of these approaches, the curriculum can be designed so that students can complete the foundation proposed here and choose from additional courses such as computer science, technical mathematics, statistics, and calculus. Whatever the approach taken, all students learn the same core material while some, if they wish, can study additional mathematics consistent with their interests and career directions.
These Standards are demanding. It will take time, patience, and skill to implement the vision they represent. The content and pedagogical demands of curricula aligned with these Standards will require extended and sustained professional development for teachers and a large degree of administrative support. Such efforts are essential. We owe our children no less than a high degree of quantitative literacy and mathematical knowledge that prepares them for citizenship, work, and further study. |
|||||||||||||||
|