|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
| Students must learn mathematics with understanding, actively building new knowledge from experience and prior knowledge. |
The vision of school mathematics in Principles and Standards is
based on students' learning mathematics with understanding. Unfortunately,
learning mathematics without understanding has long been a common
outcome of school mathematics instruction. In fact, learning without understanding
has been a persistent problem since at least the 1930s, and it has been
the subject of much discussion and research by psychologists and educators
over the years (e.g., Brownell [1947]; Skemp [1976]; Hiebert and Carpenter
[1992]). Learning the mathematics outlined in chapters 37 requires
understanding and being able to apply procedures, concepts, and processes.
In the twenty-first century, all students should be expected to understand
and be able to apply mathematics.
In recent decades, psychological and educational research on the learning of complex subjects such as mathematics has solidly established the important role of conceptual understanding in the knowledge and activity of persons who are proficient. Being proficient in a complex domain such as mathematics entails the ability to use knowledge flexibly, applying what is learned in one setting appropriately in another. One of the most robust findings of research is that conceptual understanding is an important component of proficiency, along with factual knowledge and procedural facility (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 1999).
The alliance of factual knowledge, procedural proficiency, and conceptual understanding
makes all three components usable in powerful ways. Students who memorize
facts or procedures without understanding often are not sure when or how
to use what they know, and such learning is often quite fragile (Bransford,
Brown, and Cocking 1999). Learning with understanding also makes subsequent
learning easier. Mathematics makes more sense and is easier to remember
and to apply when students connect new knowledge to existing knowledge
in meaningful ways (Schoenfeld 1988). Well-connected, conceptually grounded
ideas are more readily accessed for use in new situations (Skemp 1976).
The requirements for the workplace and for civic participation in the contemporary world include flexibility in reasoning about and using quantitative information. Conceptual understanding is an essential component of the knowledge needed to deal with novel problems and settings. Moreover, as judgments change about the facts or procedures that are essential in an increasingly technological world, conceptual understanding becomes even more important. For example, most of the arithmetic and algebraic procedures long viewed as the heart of the school mathematics curriculum can now be performed with handheld calculators. Thus, more attention can be given to understanding the number concepts and the modeling procedures used in solving problems. Change is a ubiquitous feature of » contemporary life, so learning with understanding is essential to enable students to use what they learn to solve the new kinds of problems they will inevitably face in the future.
A major goal of school mathematics programs is to create autonomous learners,
and learning with understanding supports this goal. Students learn more
and learn better when they can take control of their learning by defining
their goals and monitoring their progress. When challenged with appropriately
chosen tasks, students become confident in their ability to tackle difficult
problems, eager to figure things out on their own, flexible in exploring
mathematical ideas and trying alternative solution paths, and willing
to persevere. Effective learners recognize the importance of reflecting
on their thinking and learning from their mistakes. Students should view
the difficulty of complex mathematical investigations as a worthwhile
challenge rather than as an excuse to give up. Even when a mathematical
task is difficult, it can be engaging and rewarding. When students work
hard to solve a difficult problem or to understand a complex idea, they
experience a very special feeling of accomplishment, which in turn leads
to a willingness to continue and extend their engagement with mathematics.
Students will be served well by school mathematics programs that enhance
their natural desire to understand what they are asked to learn. From
a young age, children are interested in mathematical ideas. Through their
experiences in everyday life, they gradually develop a rather complex
set of informal ideas about numbers, patterns, shapes, quantities, data,
and size, and many of these ideas are correct and robust. Thus children
learn many mathematical ideas quite naturally even before they enter school
(Gelman and Gallistel 1978; Resnick 1987). A pattern of building new learning
on prior learning and experience is established early and repeated, albeit
often in less obvious ways, throughout the school years (see, e.g., Steffe
[1994]). Students of all ages have a considerable knowledge base on which
to build, including ideas developed in prior school instruction and those
acquired through everyday experience (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 1999).
The kinds of experiences teachers provide clearly play a major role in determining the extent and quality of students' learning. Students' understanding of mathematical ideas can be built throughout their school years if they actively engage in tasks and experiences designed to deepen and connect their knowledge. Learning with understanding can be further enhanced by classroom interactions, as students propose mathematical ideas and conjectures, learn to evaluate their own thinking and that of others, and develop mathematical reasoning skills (Hanna and Yackel forthcoming). Classroom discourse and social interaction can be used to promote the recognition of connections among ideas and the reorganization of knowledge (Lampert 1986). By having students talk about their informal strategies, teachers can help them become aware of, and build on, their implicit informal knowledge (Lampert 1989; Mack 1990). Moreover, in such settings, procedural fluency and conceptual understanding can be developed through problem solving, reasoning, and argumentation. »
| NCTM Home | Illuminations Web site |
|
|