|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Instructional
programs from prekindergarten through grade 12 should enable all students
to
|
Students in grades 35 study a considerable amount of new mathematical content,
and their ability to understand and manage these new ideas will rest,
in part, on how well the ideas are connected. Connecting mathematical
ideas includes linking new ideas to related ideas considered previously.
These connections help students see mathematics as a unified body of knowledge
rather than as a set of complex and disjoint concepts, procedures, and
processes.
Two big ideas that recur throughout
the study of mathematics in grades 35 were elaborated on in the
introduction at the beginning of the chapter: equivalence and multiplicative
reasoning. Each should receive major emphasis at this level, in part because
each is connected to so many topics studied in grades 35. For example,
students learn that a fraction has an equivalent decimal representation,
that the area of a right triangle is equal to half of the area of a related
rectangle, that 150 centimeters is the same as 1.5 meters, and that the
likelihood of getting heads when flipping a coin is the same as the likelihood
of rolling an even number on a number cube. Some equivalences are not
obvious to students and thus prompt further exploration to understand
"why." As equivalence continues to emerge in the study of different mathematical
content areas, it fosters a sense of unity and connectedness in the study
of mathematics. Likewise, as students solve problems as diverse as counting
the possible combinations of shirts and shorts in a wardrobe and measuring
the area of a rectangle, they begin to see and use a similar multiplicative
structure in both situations. Their work in developing computational algorithms
highlights properties of multiplication that they can model geometrically,
reason about, and express in general terms. Thus, multiplicative structures
connect ideas from number, algebra, and geometry. Equivalence and multiplicative
reasoning help students see that mathematics is not a set of isolated
topics but rather a web of closely connected ideas.
Real-world contexts provide opportunities for students to connect what they are learning to their own environment. Students' experiences at home, at school, and in their community provide contexts for worthwhile mathematical tasks. For example, ideas of position and direction » such as those used in walking from one place to another can be used to develop the geometric idea of using coordinates to describe a location. In a fourth-grade class, students could make a map on a coordinate system of the various routes they use to walk to school. With the map, they could determine and compare the distances traveled. Everyday experiences can also be the source of data. In a fifth-grade classroom, students may want to investigate questions about after-school activities. How many students participate in such activities? What are the activities? How frequently do they participate? Is the level of participation consistent across the year? Is there a way to describe the class on the basis of their activities? Encouraging students to ask questions and to use mathematical approaches to find answers helps them see the value of mathematics and also motivates them to study new mathematical ideas.
There are connections within mathematics, and mathematics is also connected to, and used within, other disciplines. Building on these connections provides opportunities to enrich the learning in both areas. For example, in a social studies unit, a fifth-grade class might discuss the population and area of selected states. They can investigate which states are most and least crowded. By using almanacs, Web-based databases, and maps, they can collect data and construct charts to summarize the information. Once the information is collected, they will need to determine how to consider both area and population in order to judge crowdedness. Such discussions could lead to an informal consideration of population density and land use.
In grades 35, students should be developing the important processes needed for scientific inquiry and for mathematical problem solvinginferring, measuring, communicating, classifying, and predicting. The kinds of investigations that enable students to build these processes often include significant mathematics as well as science. It is important that teachers stimulate discussion about both the mathematics and the science ideas that emerge from the investigations, whether they occur in a science lesson or a mathematics lesson. For example, students might study the evaporation of liquid from an open container. How does the volume of liquid in the container change over time? From which type of jar does 100 cubic centimeters of water evaporate fasterone with a large opening or one with a small opening? Figure 5.36 (Goldberg 1997, p. 2) shows the results of an experiment to examine this question. The table shows the volume of water in each jar over a five-day period. Is there a pattern in the data? If so, what are some ways to describe the pattern? How many days will it take for all the water in jar 1 to evaporate? A discussion about why the water evaporates faster from a wider container and what might happen if certain conditions are alteredfor example, if a fan is left blowing on the containersintegrates concepts of both mathematics and science.
![]()
|
The development of mathematical ideas and the use of mathematics in other disciplines are intertwined. At times, new ideas develop in a purely mathematical context and are applied to other situations. At other times, new mathematics arises out of situations in other disciplines or in real-world contexts. Mathematical investigations that are drawn strictly from the realm of mathematics are also appropriate and important. The value of a mathematical task is not dependent on whether it has a real-world context but rather on whether it addresses important mathematics, is intellectually engaging, and is solvable using » tools the learner has or can draw on. The use of similar mathematics within different contexts gives students an appreciation of the power of mathematics and its generality. As stated in a National Research Council report (1996, p. 105):
Students at all grade levels and in every domain of science should have the opportunity to use scientific inquiry and develop the ability to think and act in ways associated with inquiry, including asking questions, planning and conducting investigations, using appropriate tools and techniques to gather data, thinking critically and logically about relationships between evidence and explanations, constructing and analyzing alternative explanations, and communicating scientific arguments.
Teachers should select tasks that help students explore and develop increasingly sophisticated mathematical ideas. They should ask questions that encourage and challenge students to explain new ideas and develop new strategies based on mathematics they already know. For example, asking students to describe two ways they can estimate the cost of twelve notebooks can prompt different strategies. Figure 5.37 illustrates two strategies that might emergea rounding strategy and another strategy based on proportionality, a new idea that will receive considerable attention in later grades. »
|
Teachers should help students explore and describe mathematical connections and ensure that they see mathematical ideas in a variety of contexts and models. For example, as students explain their strategies for estimating the cost of the twelve notebooks, the teacher should point out how the second strategy relates to multiplication and how it can be modeled using a fractional representation (e.g., 2 for $1 means 12 for $6, or 2/1 = 12/6).
Teachers should encourage students to look for mathematical ideas throughout
the school day. For example, geometry can play an important role in art,
data should have a prominent role in social studies discussions, and communication
and problem solving should be integrated with language arts. Scientific
contexts can be especially productive for exploring and using mathematics.
Mathematics and science have a long history of close ties, and many mathematical
notions arose from scientific problems. Teachers should build on everyday
experiences to encourage the study of mathematical ideas through systematic,
quantitative investigations of phenomena that students can experience
directly. These may include applications as varied as studying the relationship
between the arm span and height of students, investigating the strength
of a particular brand of paper towel, or studying the volume and surface
area of different cereal boxes.
At times, opportunities for mathematical investigations arise spontaneously in class. For example, after a fifth-grade class spent some time learning about environmental issues, a question arose as to whether the water fountain was an efficient way of getting water to students. The class formulated a plan to respond to the question. This included estimating how much water the fountain released during a "typical" turn at the fountain and how much water was actually consumed. In a situation like this, the teacher plays an important role in helping students understand and think about the scientific and mathematical topics that this investigation evokes. »
Although the teacher's role includes being alert and responsive to unexpected opportunities, it is also important that teachers plan ahead to integrate mathematics into other subject areas and experiences that students will have during the year. Consider, for example, the following episode, adapted from Russell, Schifter, and Bastable (1999).
| Ms.
Watson's fourth grade runs a snack shop for two weeks every school
year to pay for a trip to meet the class's pen pals in a neighboring
state. Since the students run the whole project, from planning what
to sell to recording sales and reordering stock, Ms. Watson uses this
project as an opportunity for students to develop and use mathematical
ideas. It is clear that a great deal of estimation and calculation
takes place naturally as part of the project: projecting what will
be needed for the trip, making change, keeping records of expenses,
calculating income, and so forth. This year Ms. Watson decided to
extend some of the ideas her students had encountered about collecting
and describing data through their work on this project.
At the beginning of the project, she gave the class a list of twenty-one items, available at a local warehouse club, that she and the principal had approved as possible sale items. The students needed to decide which of these products they would sell and how they would allocate the $100 provided for their start-up costs to buy certain quantities of those products. They had limited time to make these decisions, and the class engaged in a lively discussion about how best to find out which of the snack items were most popular among the students in the school. Some students insisted that they would need to survey all classes in order to get "the correct information." If they surveyed only some students, this group contended, then "we won't give everyone a chance, so we won't know about something that maybe only one person likes." Others argued that surveying one or two classes at each grade level would provide enough of an idea of what students across the grades like and would result in a set of data they could collect and organize more efficiently. As they talked, the teacher reminded them of the purpose of their survey: "Will our business fail if we don't have everyone's favorite?" The class eventually decided to survey one class at each grade. Even the students who had worried that a sample would not give them complete information had become convinced that this procedure would give them enough information to make good choices about which snacks to buy.
The students went on to design their surveywhich raised new issuesand to collect, organize, and use the data to develop their budget. Once they had their data, another intense discussion ensued about how to use the information to guide their choices on how to stock their snack shop. They eventually chose to buy the two top choices in each category (they had classified the snacks into four categories), and since that didn't use up their budget, they ordered additional quantities of the overall top two snacks. |
Ms. Watson used this realistic context to help her students see how decisions about designing data investigations are tied to the purpose or » the problem being addressed. The real restrictions of time and resources made it natural for the students to consider how a sample can be selected to represent a population, and they were able to interpret their data in light of the decisions they needed to make.
Ultimately, connections within mathematics, connections between mathematics and everyday experience, and connections between mathematics and other disciplines can support learning. Building on the connections can also make mathematics a challenging, engaging, and exciting domain of study.
| NCTM Home | Illuminations Web site |
|
|