|
Process
1. Students in groups will research U.S.- Mexican Immigration to look at the issue through the eyes of different groups of people on both sides of the border. They will decide how immigration affects the lives of the persona that they have been assigned. Student groups will all assume the character of a specific person or group who are involved in some way with immigration and/or immigrants. They will research the costs and benefits of immigration to this person or group and prepare a position paper detailing these costs and benefits and what kind of treaty this person or group would like to see the Presidents of the United States and Mexico adopt. Students will also have assignments that are specific to each scenario. Students may work by using other web pages, but if they do they need to evaluate each web page using the guidelines from:
http://projects.edtech.sandi.net/staffdev/tpss99/processguides/evaluating_student.html
2. Students will work together to come to a consensus incorporating all of the viewpoints
that the students have researched. Students need to understand what consensus is by using the guidelines on the following web pages:
http://projects.edtech.sandi.net/staffdev/tpss99/processguides/consensus.html
http://www.ic.org/pnp/ocac/#anchor1464290
They will then work towards producing one policy that chosen members of each group will present to the class.
3. Students will be divided into 5 groups. Each group will take on the persona of the person or persons of the scenario. After all tasks are complete, then students will proceed to the hearing.
Return to main menu
Scenario Guide
I. Hugo Castrellon-Undocumented Mexican Immigrant
II. Miguel Juarez and His Family-Restaurant Owners
III. Robert Martin-U.S. Teenager
IV. Isadora Zaragosa and her Family
V. Amalia Lopez-Mexican Immigrant and Medicaid Recipient
Return to main menu
Continue to the task
Hearing Preparation
1. Each group will read the person or group description. They will discuss what that person's opinions on the topic of Mexican-U.S. immigration. Each group will study the suggested websites and then they will complete all tasks given them. Each group will bring their costs/ benefits analysis and position statement to the hearing with copies for all of the other classmates. Make sure that students in each group understand all the provisions of their statement that they are proposing.
2. Each testimony group should carefully review their position statements and costs benefits analysis and prepare an outline of arguments to present during their testimony. Their arguments should be based on accurate information. Students may consult resources in the library, local experts, and current journals and periodicals, but must use required web pages. The students in these groups should create or present charts, diagrams, tables, and/or outlines to support and clarify their arguments.
3. Each group will assign a person to be a part of the reviewing committee. This committee will elect a chairman that will preside over the committee who will come to consensus on the details of the final proposal for the Presidents of Mexico and the United States.
4. Each group will assign one person to be a part of the media. The media group will write a preliminary news article, outlining the key provisions of the bill and summarizing the likely arguments to be made for and against the bill. The article will be read aloud just prior to starting the hearing. They may also present any political cartoons or other commentary at this time.
Return to main menu
The Hearing
1. The chairperson of the committee will announce the order in which the testimonies will be given. Each group will have a chance to testify for at least 10 minutes, but none will testify for more than 20 minutes. Various members of the committee will ask questions and take notes.
2. During the hearing, the media group will take notes on their observations. During a break in the hearing, the media will write a press release to summarize the proceedings. They may also release any cartoons or editorials.
4. During a break, the committee will decide whether or not they have come to consensus, or that there is no possible way to do so. After the break, the committee's decision will be announced and discussed. Members of the committee must give clear explanations for the decisions they have made. If they have come to consensus, they will list all the details that will go into the final position statement. If they have not come to consensus, they will list the details that they agreed upon, and they will list the details that they could not agree upon. Each group will return to their original groups and will write a final position statement to send to the presidents.
Return to main menu
|
|
II. Miguel Juarez and His Family-Restaurant Owners
Mr. Juarez came to the United States from Guadalajara, Mexico in 1981. He left his family in Mexico, and he entered into the United States as an immigrant agricultural worker. When his visa expired, he did not leave the States, but he moved to Springdale, Arkansas because he had been told that there were many jobs there. He worked in a Mexican restaurant for several years always being paid in cash. He paid no taxes or social security.
In 1986 he was given amnesty by the Immigration and Reform Control Act (IRCA) Amnesty. This was a blanket amnesty for some 2.7 million illegal aliens in the United States. Those who could show that they had resided illegally in the United States continuously since at least January 1, 1982 and those who had worked as agricultural workers for at least 90 days between May 1, 1985 and May 1, 1986 were granted amnesty. This bill also increased border controls and created a program to verify the immigration status of aliens applying for certain welfare benefits. After becoming an American citizen, he applied for the rest of his family (his wife and children) to come to the United States. They were granted worker status, and they all came and started a Mexican restaurant in Fayetteville, Arkansas. They had great success and eventually started two other restaurants. The Juarez family continued to run its restaurants using a mostly cash economy. They continued to send money back to their other relatives in Mexico. They continue to hire new immigrants while teaching them the restaurant trade and helping them to learn to speak English. All of the family and their employees work and socialize together. Mr. Juarez's mother never learned to speak English since she does not work in the restaurants, but she stayed home and tends the children and grandchildren. The men in the family learned English in order to do business. The youngest child in the Juarez family was only two when the family moved north. He went to American schools and learned English and became a typical American teenager. He graduated from college, but his parents were not pleased that he did not care about their Mexican customs. The Juarez family lead very prosperous lives in the United States. They continue to help their relatives in Mexico and they maintain a residence in Mexico, which they visit periodically. They live in a mostly Hispanic community in Northwest Arkansas. They attend Spanish church services, shop in Spanish speaking stores and continue with their Mexican traditions such as Quincañeras, El Cinco de Mayo, y La Señora de Guadalupe. Their youngest child continues to not participate in many of these traditions.
Tasks for Miguel Juarez and His Family Restaurant Owners
1. Read the article The Occupational Assimilation of Hispanics in the U.S.: Evidence from Panel Data by Maude Toussaint-Comeau at:
http://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedhwp/wp-04-15.html
Read about how some Mexicans come to the U.S.at:
http://www.fayar.net/east/teacher.web/worldlang/lemons/guide.html
Research for information about how Mexican immigrants assimilate into the U.S. culture or not. Keep in mind the scenario of the Juarez family.
Also read: http://www.cis.org/topics/assimilation.html
Write an article for the local newspaper that tells the Juarez story as an example of immigrants who come up having nothing and now are running a profitable business. Add details and the feelings of the family about what they have accomplished.
2. Make a costs/benefits analysis of the life in the United States of a Mexican Immigrant using the article and the Juarez family's scenario.
MAKE SURE THAT YOU USE THE ECONOMIC TERMS THAT YOU STUDIED AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS UNIT http://www.cis.org/topics/costs.html
3. Prepare a position statement that you think the Juarez family would write about Mexican immigration to the United States. What would they suggest the Presidents put in the treaty?
Return to main menu
|

|
|
IV. Isadora Zaragosa and her Family
Immigrant Money Transfers Expected To Reach $150 Billion This Year
This story adapted from article in the Salt Lake Tribune 12/26/2004 by Rhina Guidos
SAN DIONISIO, Mexico - In this rural village, there is no industry, no paved roads, not even signs to tell visitors where it begins and ends. There are big houses, though, that wouldn't look out of place in West Valley City. Electricity, too, and indoor plumbing. And cell phones, even in the humblest of adobe-and-brick homes.
But for Isidora Zaragosa, 62, all that progress cannot fill the void left by the young, men and women, including her children, who abandoned San Dionisio long ago. Like thousands of other Mexicans, most of them immigrated to the United States - particularly to Utah - leaving behind the broken hearts of their mothers, their children, their husbands and wives. Those good men and women left, Zaragosa said, not because they wanted to but because they had to.
They couldn't earn enough money shucking corn and hauling alfalfa in this village of 1,600 to pay for their children's school uniforms, for immunizations, for meat to accompany the scant servings of nopal and maguey cactus the townspeople typically eat.
Now, the lucky ones in San Dionisio eat well, in lighted, warmer rooms, all courtesy of the money that family members earn by cleaning hotel rooms, washing dishes in restaurants, building highways, university halls and even Mormon temples in Utah.
Worldwide, some 80 million people, like the residents of San Dionisio, work abroad to support their families. Economists call the cross-border monetary transfers they make "remittances." On a global level, remittances are expected to reach the $150 billion mark by the end of the year.
What San Dionisio's residents are doing isn't unusual. But because they base the bulk of their economic growth on money they receive from a single source - Utah jobs - their story is anything but ordinary. "Always been heartbreaking": Sitting on the edge of her bed, Isidora Zaragosa recalled all those nights she spent in this room crying and praying to God to please protect her children. One by one, her five sons and two of her five daughters told her they were going to a far away place mentioned by the families of those who had children "on the other side." Whenever someone left San Dionisio that meant they were heading to Salt Lake City, nowhere else. "I couldn't stop them," Zaragosa said.
She'd endured a similar loss decades ago, when her husband Inés headed north on a guest worker program to the United States for braceros, the thousands of Mexican laborers who toiled in agriculture or on the railroads while American men fought in World War II. But when her children left, the void was far deeper.
"It's always been heartbreaking to watch them go," she said. She knew, however, that she was no different than many of the families of this highland village 62 miles north of Mexico City.
For years, no one knows how long, men and women had been leaving, but always remembering to send a few dollars home to help their parents buy corn for tortillas - and maybe a few farm animals. Today, the money flowing southward buys far more than tortillas, and San Dionisio bears the mark of a modern city 1,500 miles away.
An old woman walks down the street wearing a purple Utah Jazz cap. A mother shows off a photo of her daughter posing next to a Mormon pioneer handcart and points to a wall laden with coffee mugs of Salt Lake City hotels where her children have worked. Cars and trucks with "Ski Utah" license plates are parked in garages around town. The money Mrs. Zaragoza's son, Francisco, saved from his jobs was enough to buy about 8 1/2 acres next to his mother's property. That's where he's building his dream home, although it's nothing fancy like his brother's two-story house, a replica of the Utah homes they helped build.
Back when Francisco was a boy, he watched families struggle to build even rudimentary adobe homes. Some men like his father went to labor in the United States through a guest worker program. Like all braceros, his father In&ecutes was encouraged to put money into a savings program sponsored by banks in the United States and Mexico. But when the war ended and the workers were no longer needed, the U.S. government sent the men home. When they tried to retrieve their savings, the money had disappeared.
Those who work in the United States have little trust in banks or the government, and they send remittances directly to families through Western Union or small money-transfer services. Their work and money pads Mexico's towns and cities with almost $10 billion and contributes to an estimated $450 billion that immigrants inject into the U.S. economy, according to the Inter-American Development Bank.
Unlike the braceros of the 1940s and 60s, however, today's itinerant workers are not escorted through the country, documented, hosed down and assigned a job. Though some San Dionisians are legal U.S. residents or naturalized citizens, those who cannot obtain legal documents to work abroad seek the services of a pollero or coyote to smuggle them into the United States and eventually Utah.
Once they reach Salt Lake City, a network of friends helps them find jobs. In many cases, the townsfolk say, Utah employers place a call to San Dionisio, seek out former or new workers and offer them jobs, even though they know some don't have the documents needed to work.
Those San Dionisians who haven't been north are tempted to make the trip because they see first-hand what awaits the families of those residents who do leave. There haven't been any San Dionisian deaths along the border yet, "thanks to the grace of God," Zaragosa said. But the human stakes are growing as an increasing number of women, including Zaragosa's daughter-in-law, leave their children behind to join the U.S. work force.
Nieves P&ecute;rez, a shy 15-year-old girl from San Dionisio, lived for several years without her parents along with six other siblings in the care of her grandmother. She said it's nice to get presents from abroad. But it's painful to hear the distant voice of a mother and father on the telephone, and in her case, the cries of an American-born sibling she had never met. But, she said, her parents are good people who just want to give her and her eight siblings "a good life." When asked if the good life is worth living apart as a family, she shrugged and softly replied, "Who knows?"
That ambivalence is rarely seen in the adults of San Dionisio, who commute to Salt Lake City every few years and make plans about what they will do in the future with the money from abroad. Isidora Zaragosa says she doesn't want to guess what San Dionisio will look like in five or 10 years if remittances keep coming at their current pace. They already have changed the landscape, the architecture and even the people. The young folks these days talk about finishing secondary school and immediately heading north, she said.
For Zaragosa, the only thing that matters is to have her sons and daughters and grandchildren nearby. Remittances may play a part in that, she believes, because eventually her sons will come home to live in the houses they have built. "Some day, they're going to feel old, they're going to feel alone, and they're going to want to return home," Zaragosa said.
Her son Francisco tries to lighten her sentiments with a story: On Valentine's Day, which in Mexico signifies friendship more than romantic love, the people decorate the town with the flags of the United States and Mexico, he said. It is a symbol of the well-deserved appreciation San Dionisio owes its northern neighbor. "We are very grateful to the United States," Francisco said. "Without the U.S., we wouldn't have anything here. It's good to feel proud and to be grateful to say, 'Because of that country, I was able to do something here.' I hope this will help my children someday to focus on trying to get ahead, to see what we have done and to follow our example."
Tasks Isadora Zaragosa and her Family
1. Read about the Bracero Program at http://www.farmworkers.org/bracerop.html
Write 5 letters from Mr. Zaragoza during the time he was in the bracero program to his wife and family in Mexico.
Read about remittances at http://news.ft.com/cms/s/ccd06de6-73e7-11d9-b705-00000e2511c8.htm
2. Prepare a costs/benefits analysis of Mrs. Zaragoza's decision to stay in Mexico while her family went to the U.S. Read http://www.cis.org/topics/costs.html
MAKE SURE THAT YOU USE THE ECONOMIC TERMS THAT YOU STUDIED AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS UNIT.
3. Go to: http://www.paisanomexicano.com/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=18 and read about the life of a pollero or coyote.
4. Prepare a position statement that you think Mrs. Zaragoza would write about Mexican immigration to the United States. What would she suggest the Presidents put in the treaty?
Return to main menu
|

|
|
V. Amalia Lopez-Mexican Immigrant and Medicaid Recipient
Amalia Lopez is a Mexican immigrant who came to the United States when she was 15. Her father and mother and her two brothers came by walking across the deserts of Northern Mexico and into Arizona. It was a long and arduous trip. She and her family eventually settled in Arkansas living with friends from their hometown, Tampico, Mexico. She went to school for two years, and learned some English. She was able to attend school because school systems cannot ask children or their parents for information about their immigration status. She did not graduate because she got married and was soon pregnant. Amalia's husband Miguel did not have any insurance because he worked on a roofing crew that paid cash to its workers and did not have any benefits. While he made good money for an uneducated immigrant, he did not have extra money for all of the doctor's bills especially since he was sending money home to help support his parents in Mexico. Amalia went to the Arkansas Department of Health where illegal aliens can receive prenatal care as a part of the state's Medicaid program. The state offers a prenatal care program specifically to illegal aliens who are pregnant, the idea being that the baby who is born of that pregnancy will be a U.S. citizen who's eligible for the state's ARKids First Medicaid program. The state decided to implement an optional program because officials believed it could save money in the long run. On average, prenatal care costs $1300 from doctors' appointments to post-delivery care, compared to an average of $1800 for one day in a neonatal intensive care unit. Good prenatal care can prevent an intensive care stay in some cases. There is a movement in the state of Arkansas to end any services to undocumented aliens. They feel that the aliens are lawbreakers who are just being rewarded with services such as Medicaid and education. The Governor feels that it is important to protect future citizens. Since many Mexican immigrants have not finished school, education is important for their children. It enables them to learn English, acculturate into the American culture and allows them to move up economically. Illegal immigrants often become an underclass of people who do not acculturate, are not educated, do not speak English, have no rights, and can easily be indentured, living in fear, and abused. Undocumented immigrants who use false papers pay taxes and social security but rarely apply for tax refunds or social security.
Tasks Amalia Lopez Mexican Immigrant and Medicaid Recipient
1. Read about the costs of Social Services for immigrants in the United States: http://www.cis.org/articles/1994/back294.htm
2. Take BOTH sides- Amalia's side that these services are good for the future of Arkansas AND the side of those who think that illegal immigrants are a drain on American taxpayers.
3. Make a costs/benefits analysis of Amalia's choices. MAKE SURE THAT YOU USE THE ECONOMIC TERMS THAT YOU STUDIED AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS UNIT http://www.cis.org/topics/costs.html
AND
4. Make a costs/benefits analysis of immigrants' public services in relation to the needs of the American Tax payer. http://www.cis.org/topics/costs.html
5. Prepare a position statement that you think Amalia Lopez would write about Mexican immigration to the United States. What would he suggest the Presidents put in the treaty?
OR
Prepare a position statement that you think the opposition to immigrant government services would write about Mexican immigration to the United States. What would they suggest the Presidents put in the treaty?
|

|